|
1
|
- An introduction compiled and presented by:
- Kennet Lindquist,
- CEO, SwedishTelePedagogic Knowledge Centre
|
|
2
|
- Core concepts – some reflections
- Trends - some highlights/challenges
- Ongoing activities – some illustrations
- Useful solutions – some examples
- Issues to address – some proposals
|
|
3
|
- “EU must be more competitive, a knowledge-based economy”
- “EU member countries need to make radical transformations and modernise
their economy and in its educational services”
- Penetration of EUs ‘cities of Europe’ Ed&Trg policy documents (Lisbon,
Stockholm, Barcelona, Brussels, Bologna, Luxeburg, Cardiff, Copenhagen,
Fiera, aso) will however show a very mixed collection of reiteration of
‘old things’ possibly with ‘new clothes’ (such as LLL), but few radical
transformation proposals on strategy or operational levels.
- The 11 November interim report of the progress of the “2010 ambitions”
is almost as severe for Europe as the 9-11 for US. The difference is
that very few hear any alarm-bells ringing.
|
|
4
|
- Insufficient headways (focus/investments in key areas/issues)
- Is the proposed platform designed for a knowledge-economy or not?
- EU lags behind US (are we sure we are in the same race?)
- Can we become different/better by simply playing ‘follow John’?
- Lower absorption of students from other regions
- Can a LLL perspective be applied also here, or relationship management
- Many warning-lights still red (emphasis on weak sectors)
- If main focus is on weakest resources how to become competitive?
- Teacher shortage/situation
serious (more of the same)
- Is present teacher-student structure fit to a future knowledge-economy?
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
- EU policy concerns relating to Ed&Trg / LLL / LR-LC
- An essentially empty chapter despite its stated priority
- LR initiatives points in all directions (partially vision-less)
- LLL is increasingly approached on policy level as ‘more Ed&Trg’
- Skill Strategy vs. Knowledge Economy demands
- Skill strategy’ uses familiar words but implies considerable changes
- Maintaining the skill strategy orientation in lower echelons requires
care
- Strategy formulations
- Cost less
- Involves fewer
- Take less time
- Is easier to agree on
- … than Strategy implementation (an easy though but tough to accept
reality)
- More attention, resources and support to strategy implementation is
needed
- Skill strategies must be anchored in the local/regional implementation
context
- Skill strategy implementation is substantially more than skills
development
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
- Support strategy
- Initiation approaches
- Readiness generation
- Engaging Stakeholders
- Activity management
- Marketing/Dissemination
- Evaluation process
- Quality assurance
|
|
23
|
- Different phases of LR/LC development requires different support
services
- Different actors come in at different development stages
- A personalised / user-centred service approach is needed
- Not all actors will admit in time that they need support
|
|
24
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
- SWOT-based approaches
- Indicator-based approaches
- Actor-cluster approaches
- Foresight-based approaches
- Capacity-based approaches
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
- Community life-cycle
- LR/LC development stages
- Stages of readiness
- Engagement readiness
- Using readiness barometers
|
|
35
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
38
|
- Stakeholder analysis
- Measuring LR/LC value
- Value of LR/LC relationships
- Value-creation cycle
- Alliance generation
- Community consultation
- Stakeholder involvement
|
|
39
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
45
|
- Need for inter-community support and exchange service environment
- Virtual community services act as a ‘cross-breeder’ between communities
- Enables sub- and cross-community initiatives, theme-based working groups
and joint projects
- Inter-project management monitoring and reporting
|
|
46
|
|
|
47
|
- Online project management
- Project information
- Project activities
- Project actor involvement
- Project budget/costing
- Progress reporting
- Cost/resource reporting
- Distributed management
- Project administration
- Project Work blocks
- Partner coordination
- Activity management
- Cost accounting
- Responsible/assistants
|
|
48
|
- Information on ‘cards’
- Project Card
- Work Block Card
- Partner Card
- Project Actor Card
- Reference to community info
- Member cards
- Organisation cards
- Groups/Communities
- Resource materials
- Interconnect with ‘engines’
- Display engine
- Calendar engine
- Inquiry engine
|
|
49
|
- Project management systems are good evaluation tools
- Evaluation concerns should be addressed before action starts
- Evaluate the ‘collaborative journey’ throughout initiatives
- Evaluate the contextual impact of the initiatives taken
|
|
50
|
- Defintion of collaboratives
- Communication
- Contribution
- Coordination
- Coperation
- Collaboration
- The Collaborative Journey
- ‘Getting started’
- ‘En route’
- ‘Arrived’
- Evaluation of ..
- Self-interest
- Feasibility
- Process
- Outcomes
|
|
51
|
- Five-tiered approach
- Programme definition
- Accountability
- Understanding
- Progress toward objectives
- Long-term outcomes
|
|
52
|
- Many quality dimensions to address in a LR/LC initiative
- Quality assurance is a ‘core’ management task
- Use established quality standards/practices
- Quality of service provision is highly crucial for LR/LC
- Quality assurance through indicators and benchmarking
|
|
53
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
58
|
- Shared community services are important marketing and dissemination
channels
- Use available marketing and dissemination guides/roadmaps
- Implement frequent reviews of dissemination practices
- Provide tools that promotes consistency between LR/LC
- Instil a culture of info sharing and usage of others solutions
- Facilitate marketing and dissemination of know-how and experiences among
LR/LC actors
|
|
59
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
66
|
- Ensure a solid support ‘umbrella’ for the learning community initiatives
- Adopt a support-oriented learning community development rather than
pursue directive-oriented learning community initiatives
- Provide wide range of guides and tools for the learning region all
adjustable to different ‘maturity levels’ among the involved actors
- Ensure early and continuing training of ‘core actors’ within the
learning communities as well as to the support service providers
- Avoid ‘reinventing the wheel’ and constantly battle against the too
common NIH-syndrome among learning service providers
|